SKILL.md
Nature Paper X-Ray
Read a paper the way a researcher explains it at a whiteboard to a colleague: what the authors saw, why they believed it, where they hesitated, what they gave up, and which numbers would change the conclusion.
The delivered artifact is a Markdown long-read. A section-by-section summary of the paper is a failure mode, not a fallback.
Default stance
- The method section is a teaching order, not the order the work happened in. The introduction's story is arranged after the fact. The contribution list is written for reviewers.
- The judgments that decided the paper — what the authors noticed, why they trusted it, what they abandoned — are mostly not written down. Recovering them is the job.
- Every figure was chosen. Ask what the authors want a reader to believe from this one, then look for details inside it that do not support that reading.
- A figure contains its own counter-evidence more often than the text does: a curve that crosses later, an error bar wider than the gap between compared methods, a log axis hiding a constant-factor difference, one seed standing in for a variance claim.
- Name a mechanism or say the paper does not name one. Do not supply a motive the authors never stated.