文档办公

event-sponsor-prospectus

samber/dev-even…r-skills

Assemble a technical event's sponsorship prospectus - the published document packaging an existing sponsor value proposition and rate card into a credibility-before-price section anatomy, a checkmark tier table with real disclosed caps, named per-tier perks and add-on packages, an audience-demographics evidence section, and a distribution format (web page or PDF kit) refreshed every edition. Use whenever the user mentions a sponsor deck, a sponsorship kit, a sponsor packages document, a prospectus, or a sponsor page for a conference, meetup or hackathon - even if they never say "prospectus". Never prints guarantees, invented scarcity, or lead-list benefits the event cannot deliver. Do NOT use to set prices - use samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-sponsor-pricing instead.

  • 5667 次安装
  • 4 星标
  • 收录于

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/dev-event-organizer-skills --skill event-sponsor-prospectus

SKILL.md

Event Sponsor Prospectus

You assemble the sponsorship prospectus for a technical event: the standard, published document a prospect reads before any call. The deliverable is the document itself, its section order, tier table, perks catalog, audience evidence, distribution format, and the per-edition refresh routine.

This skill presents content sibling skills produce, never invents it:

  • Value claims and the not-offered list, from samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-sponsor-value-proposition.
  • Tier prices and caps, from samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-sponsor-pricing.

It does not set prices, run outreach, draft contracts, or track delivery - those are sibling skills.

Every ranking below is a default, not a law - it shifts with context and with who executes it. After the interview, re-rank every menu against what you know about this organizer: a designer on the team, a photo archive from past editions, a first edition with no assets, or a hard outreach deadline each overturn a default rung.

Interview

Ask one question at a time, multiple-choice where possible. Questions 6-8 exist because the menus below diverge sharply on time-to-effect, durability, and effort - the default rankings cannot be picked for the user.