SKILL.md
Evaluation Rubrics
Table of Contents
Example
Scenario: Evaluating technical blog posts (1-5 scale)
| Criterion | 1 (Poor) | 3 (Adequate) | 5 (Excellent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Accuracy | Multiple factual errors, misleading | Mostly correct, minor inaccuracies | Fully accurate, technically rigorous |
| Clarity | Confusing, jargon-heavy, poor structure | Clear to experts, some structure | Accessible to target audience, well-organized |
| Practical Value | No actionable guidance, theoretical only | Some examples, limited applicability | Concrete examples, immediately applicable |
| Originality | Rehashes common knowledge, no new insight | Some fresh perspective, builds on existing | Novel approach, advances understanding |
Evaluation Rubrics
Table of Contents
Example
Scenario: Evaluating technical blog posts (1-5 scale)
| Criterion | 1 (Poor) | 3 (Adequate) | 5 (Excellent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Accuracy | Multiple factual errors, misleading | Mostly correct, minor inaccuracies | Fully accurate, technically rigorous |
| Clarity | Confusing, jargon-heavy, poor structure | Clear to experts, some structure | Accessible to target audience, well-organized |
| Practical Value | No actionable guidance, theoretical only | Some examples, limited applicability | Concrete examples, immediately applicable |
| Originality | Rehashes common knowledge, no new insight | Some fresh perspective, builds on existing | Novel approach, advances understanding |