数据与研究

research-proposal

luwill/research-skills

Use when the user asks to write or draft a PhD / doctoral research proposal, research plan, 研究计划书, or 开题报告 — a forward-looking plan of background, gap, research questions, methodology, timeline, and significance, in English or Chinese. Triggers: "write a research proposal", "PhD proposal", "doctoral proposal", "研究计划书", "开题报告", "写博士研究计划". The literature-corpus half of 开题报告 (exhaustive, reproducible retrieval with recall evidence) belongs to the lit-search skill; this skill consumes its outputs (dois.md / references.md — the default formatted list; references.bib only when lit-search ran with --bibtex). Not for backward-looking literature reviews / 综述 / surveys (use medical-imaging-review). For grant applications (国自然/NSF) it drafts and structures the CONTENT (立项依据/研究内容/…) but never fills a funder's own form system or budget tables.

  • 911 次安装
  • 876 星标
  • 收录于

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/luwill/research-skills --skill research-proposal

SKILL.md

Research Proposal Generator

Generate a forward-looking academic research proposal — a plan for research not yet done — following flagship academic writing conventions, in English or Chinese.

This skill produces the first draft correctly, not a template to be fixed later. Its single most important discipline is citation integrity: a proposal with a fabricated reference is an academic-integrity problem, not a style problem. Read references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md before Phase 2.

Core Principles

Prose first. Proposals read as flowing, connected paragraphs — not bulleted lists. Reserve lists for a focused set of research questions/objectives (2–4 items) and timeline milestones. Never enumerate contributions, methodology, background, or significance as bullets; narrate them. Full rules and examples: references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md.

Every citation verified before it is committed. Reference count follows the argument, never a quota — there is no minimum. A PhD proposal typically cites 25–50 sources (humanities often more); a tightly argued 25 beats a padded 45. Every reference must exist (DOI/PMID/arXiv resolves, or Zotero metadata), with author and year matching the source, before it enters the proposal. Unverifiable references are flagged [UNVERIFIED] and disclosed — never fabricated. See references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md.

Write with verification, not one-shot. Draft section by section; verify each section's citations before moving to the next (Phase 4). Do not generate a full multi-section proposal with dozens of citations in a single pass — that is the structural cause of hallucinated references.

Hedge to the evidence. Use tentative language ("aims to", "may", "is expected to") for proposed work and uncertain claims; state well-established facts plainly. Do not over-claim ("will prove", "revolutionize").

Avoid the LLM tells. These phrases are AI-detector signatures — strip them: "Over the past decade, X has emerged as…", "In recent years,", "It is worth noting that", "plays a crucial/pivotal role", "has garnered significant attention", "delves into", "a testament to"; 中文: "近年来,随着……的飞速发展", "……日益受到广泛关注". Write specific openings grounded in the actual field instead of generic scene-setting.

Scenario Routing