测试与安全

re0-memo

lilmgenius/paperthin

Turn a finished, failed, or disappointing work cycle into portable lessons, anti-patterns, quality gates, and next-cycle vocabulary. Use after a build, QA pass, demo, user complaint, or abandoned attempt when the useful output is what the next pass must learn rather than the code itself.

  • 1197 次安装
  • 1400 星标
  • 收录于

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill re0-memo

SKILL.md

Turn a completed cycle into lessons the next cycle can actually use.

Goal

re0-memo extracts durable learning from a work cycle without defending the artifact that produced it. A cycle can run, pass tests, and still be the wrong thing. The output is not a changelog or therapy note: it is a local, evidence-backed record of what worked, what misled the build, and what gate the next pass must clear.

Use re0-memo when the artifact is done, failed, disappointing, or ambiguous enough that the next agent needs the cycle's lessons more than its momentum.

Workflow

  1. Read the original objective, final artifact, QA evidence, user complaints, and any local planning notes.
  2. Separate working assets from misleading progress: contracts, schemas, tests, services, vocabulary, and examples that earned reuse vs. UI, panels, scaffolds, or abstractions that only looked productive.
  3. Generalize before recording: when feedback arrives as many specific complaints, cluster them upward into the shared pattern before writing anything down — many specifics against many items usually share one root gap. Record the root and its pattern family as the lesson; keep the specifics under it as evidence, not as lessons themselves.
  4. Name each failure as an anti-pattern, not a mood.
  5. Convert repeated or high-impact failures into quality gates for the next pass.
  6. Convert vague user direction into architecture vocabulary a fresh agent can use.
  7. Write or refresh local docs for the cycle: a re0-memo for lessons and a plan for next-cycle contracts, gates, and vocabulary.
  8. Verify that a from-scratch agent could avoid the same failure from those docs alone.