测试与安全

mandela

lilmgenius/paperthin

Audit any eval, metric, experiment, or benchmark for leakage — does external ground-truth enter independently, or are the model, scorer, and designer just confirming a result no outside truth ever produced? Use before trusting any 'how we'll know it worked' — an A/B, a holdout, a score, a validation — and whenever a result feels too clean or self-confirming. Walks an 8-pattern leakage taxonomy and returns only the patterns that fire, each with an independence fix. Read-only.

  • 1335 次安装
  • 1400 星标
  • 收录于

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill mandela

SKILL.md

Audit a validation for leakage: does outside ground-truth actually enter, or is everyone confirming a result no one independently produced?

Goal

The name is the Mandela Effect — a whole population confidently remembers something that never independently happened; a leaky validation is the same shape. Walk the 8 patterns below. mandela checks one thing: whether a validation is independent, or whether the designer, model, and scorer are only confirming each other.

Workflow

  1. Identify the validation (eval / metric / experiment / holdout / "how we'll know"). Name its components — what plays model, scorer, designer, dataset.
  2. Ask the core question: does external ground-truth enter independently?
  3. Test the validation against all 8 patterns below (some apply only to certain components — a human subject, a scorer); report only the ones that fire, each by name.
  4. Give the independent-ground-truth fix for each hit.

The 8 leakage patterns